(no subject)
Aug. 30th, 2004 07:31 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
random
I think the idea of using "constructive" criticism as a weapon is just disgusting. Grammar is a really great way to feel better about yourself. I admit this. It's really fun to mock people for ending their sentences with prepositions, or employing the word "aggravate" inappropriately. Usually no one gets hurt when it comes to grammar, though, because errors are easily fixed and knowledge of grammar doesn't really reflect anything besides...knowledge of grammar.
Constructive criticism should be a much more thoughtful process, wherein the critiquer genuinely wants to help the other person improve their writing. This is almost impossible to do in a group setting, in my opinion, unless the group is extremely mature. I've never in my life encountered an extremely mature group. Group dynamics and the dynamics involved in critcism/being a good reader or writer are not all that compatible. Someone will be singled out. Remember that scene in Wonder Boys where James is reading his story and his peers are "critiquing" it? It's pretty damn hard to work past that stage, even when you're not in a group setting. And it's pretty damn easy to, under the pretense of critique, take potshots at people. Easy and cheap.
And my car broke down yesterday and I ended up at a church.
That is all.
/random
I think the idea of using "constructive" criticism as a weapon is just disgusting. Grammar is a really great way to feel better about yourself. I admit this. It's really fun to mock people for ending their sentences with prepositions, or employing the word "aggravate" inappropriately. Usually no one gets hurt when it comes to grammar, though, because errors are easily fixed and knowledge of grammar doesn't really reflect anything besides...knowledge of grammar.
Constructive criticism should be a much more thoughtful process, wherein the critiquer genuinely wants to help the other person improve their writing. This is almost impossible to do in a group setting, in my opinion, unless the group is extremely mature. I've never in my life encountered an extremely mature group. Group dynamics and the dynamics involved in critcism/being a good reader or writer are not all that compatible. Someone will be singled out. Remember that scene in Wonder Boys where James is reading his story and his peers are "critiquing" it? It's pretty damn hard to work past that stage, even when you're not in a group setting. And it's pretty damn easy to, under the pretense of critique, take potshots at people. Easy and cheap.
And my car broke down yesterday and I ended up at a church.
That is all.
/random
no subject
Date: 2004-08-30 05:59 pm (UTC)Also, I consider your post oddly/aptly timed, because I just got my first critical feedback on Skyehawke - someone correcting my syntax. Which is fine, but an odd thing to give me feedback about. Because it's not like I'm slaving over a new draft and that re-arranged syntax is going to be a breakthrough. I mean, thanks for taking the time to comment, and all, but are you really trying to help me make my story better or do you just want to show me that you can pick up my mistakes?
Sorry, too, about your car.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-30 06:11 pm (UTC)Exactly. If it's a glaring grammatical error, sure, I'd like to know about it, but I figure that unless it's coupled with some sort of substantive critique, any grammatical nitpicking is the product of someone with too much time on their hands. And I say this as someone who does it all the time, but I usually don't subject the author to my thoughts :D
Hahaha, thank you. No one ever put oil in it, so I figured it was only a matter of time.
no subject
Date: 2004-08-31 02:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-08-31 03:44 am (UTC)...questions as to why people can't master the art of using a dictionary.